les nouvelles

Solar eclipse pits superstition against science

Endeavour Crew Completes Second Spacewalk

Onetime peer-to-peer bete noir Kazaa relaunches as legitimate music site

Aids: Role of Gay Men in Spreading Virus Is Ignored in Africa, Study Finds

Smog lowers kids' IQs, even before they're born, shows New York study

Scientists discover genes responsible for aging skin

les nouvelles

NASA to begin layoffs as shuttle retirement nears

Huge impact crater discovered on Mercury:
NASA's spacecraft also observed evidence of ancient volcanoes

Isn't mercury about to go into retrograde? It seems like it just was...

Meet Elise, the girl of two with an IQ higher than Carol Vorderman!

Mind how you go: The amazing wheelchair... controlled by the power of thought

PANDEMICS IN PERSPECTIVE

Grandmother saves brother by becoming the world's oldest stem cell donor

Is Einstein the Last Great Genius?

Major breakthroughs in science have historically been the province of individuals, not institutes. Galileo and Copernicus, Edison and Einstein, toiling away in lonely labs or pondering the cosmos in private studies.
But in recent decades - especially since the Soviet success in launching the Sputnik satellite in 1957 - the trend has been to create massive institutions that foster more collaboration and garner big chunks of funding.
And it is harder now to achieve scientific greatness. A study of Nobel Prize winners in 2005 found that the accumulation of knowledge over time has forced great minds to toil longer before they can make breakthroughs. The age at which thinkers produce significant innovations increased about six years during the 20th century.
Don't count the individual genius out just yet, however.
A balance between individual and institutional approaches is the best idea, according to a new theory by a Duke University engineer Adrian Bejan, who thinks institutions benefit most from the co-existence of large groups that self-organize naturally and lone scientists coming up with brilliant new ideas.
"The history of scientific achievement is marked by solitary investigators, from Archimedes to Newton to Darwin," Bejan points out in the December issue of the International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. "Solitary thinkers have flourished throughout history because it is natural - science is good for the mind of the thinker and for the well-being of society. Even though the trend is toward the creation of large research groups, the individual will always flourish."

news

Breathing dirty air may lower kids' IQ